Breast Augmentation

Breast augmentation remains one of the most frequently sought procedures in plastic surgery, and the priorities patients bring to it have changed. Far more often than a dramatic increase in size, what patients ask for is a fuller, better-proportioned breast that sits and moves comfortably and reads as a fuller version of their own.

A considered augmentation depends on more than implant choice. It depends on where the implant is placed, how the breast is supported so the result endures, and how the transition between the implant and the patient’s own tissue is managed. Dr Sparks’ approach addresses all three: a dual-plane implant position, an internal bra for lasting support, and routine fat grafting to the medial pole to shape the cleavage.

Dr Sparks brings to breast surgery the same careful, considered approach he applies to facial plastic surgery — meticulous attention to proportion, symmetry, and the subtleties of shape. An augmentation is planned around the individual patient’s frame and anatomy, not around a number.

Breast augmentation depends on more than the implant — on where it sits, how it is supported, and how it blends with your own tissue.

Understanding Breast Augmentation

A considered, durable augmentation depends on planning each of the following to the individual patient. They are assessed together at consultation.

  • Implant position — whether the implant sits in front of, behind, or in a dual-plane relationship to the chest muscle, which influences shape, feel, and movement.
  • Implant choice — type, profile, and dimensions, selected to suit the patient’s chest width and tissue rather than to a predetermined size.
  • Tissue support — the strength of the patient’s own tissue, and the support added at surgery, which together determine whether the result holds its position.
  • The medial pole and cleavage — the inner breast, where natural fullness is difficult to achieve with an implant alone.
  • Soft-tissue coverage — the thickness of tissue over the implant, which governs how natural the upper pole looks and feels and the risk of visible rippling.

Breast implants are medical devices, not lifetime devices. Augmentation is a decision that carries a long-term commitment, including the likelihood of further surgery at some point in the future — a reality discussed fully and frankly before any decision is made.

Dr Sparks’ Philosophy & Approach

Dr Sparks’ approach to augmentation is built around a considered, durable result. The dual-plane position gives good soft-tissue coverage and a stable shape; the internal bra supports the result so it holds its position over time; and routine medial-pole fat grafting shapes the cleavage and softens the transition between implant and tissue. Implant selection is matched to the anatomy, not to a number.

The careful, considered approach he applies to facial plastic surgery — attention to proportion, symmetry, and the small details that matter — is carried directly into breast surgery. The aim is a breast that is fuller, proportionate, well supported, and precise in its detail.

Plane, support, and cleavage planned together — an augmentation that reads as a fuller version of your own breast.

Who May Be a Suitable Candidate?

Breast augmentation is appropriate for patients seeking a fuller, better-proportioned breast, who are in good health and who understand the long-term commitment that implants involve.

You may be a suitable candidate if:

  • A wish for a fuller, better-proportioned breast, or for correction of a difference in size between the breasts.
  • Loss of breast volume after pregnancy, breastfeeding, or weight change.
  • Naturally small or under-developed breasts in a patient seeking a proportionate augmentation.
  • Stable general health, non-smoker (or willing to cease well before and after surgery), and realistic expectations.
  • A clear understanding that implants are not lifetime devices and that further surgery is likely in the future.

This procedure may not be appropriate if:

  • Significant unmanaged medical conditions that increase surgical or anaesthetic risk.
  • Current smokers unable to cease — smoking materially increases the risk of wound-healing and implant-related complications.
  • A descended breast where the patient does not wish to consider the lift that would be required for a good result.
  • Body Dysmorphic Disorder, or expectations not anchored in achievable outcomes.
  • A patient not prepared to accept the long-term commitment, including the likelihood of future implant-related surgery.

Surgical Techniques

Dr Sparks’ standard approach to breast augmentation is a dual-plane implant position, an internal bra for support, and routine medial-pole fat grafting. The components below are assembled into a plan specific to the patient’s anatomy and goals.

Dual-Plane Technique

Dr Sparks’ standard implant position — a stable shape with good soft-tissue cover.

In the dual-plane technique, the implant sits partly beneath the chest (pectoralis) muscle in its upper portion and partly beneath the breast tissue in its lower portion. This combines the advantages of both planes: the muscle provides good soft-tissue coverage over the upper pole — for a smooth upper contour and a lower risk of visible rippling — while the lower position allows the breast to take a teardrop shape and the implant to sit correctly behind the nipple.

The degree of dual-plane release is adjusted to the individual breast, which is what allows the technique to be tailored rather than applied uniformly. It is Dr Sparks’ standard approach for most augmentations.

Internal Bra for Support

Internal support to help the result hold its position over time.

One of the long-term challenges of breast augmentation is that the weight of an implant, over years, tends to stretch the tissues and allow the breast to descend or the implant to settle low. To address this, Dr Sparks incorporates an internal bra — internal support that reinforces the lower pole and the implant pocket.

The internal bra acts as a reinforcing hammock within the breast, helping to hold the implant in its planned position and resist the downward stretch that would otherwise compromise the shape over time. It is part of planning for durability, not only how it looks good at the outset.

Medial-Pole Fat Grafting (Composite Augmentation)

Routine fat grafting to the inner breast for natural cleavage.

An implant alone often struggles to create natural fullness in the medial pole — the inner breast and cleavage — and an implant placed too far medially in pursuit of cleavage produces an unnatural, over-close appearance and visible edges. Dr Sparks’ solution is to routinely graft the patient’s own fat to the medial pole as part of the augmentation.

This composite approach — implant plus fat grafting — uses the implant for volume and the fat to shape the cleavage and soften the transition between the implant and the patient’s own tissue. The fat adds soft-tissue coverage where it is most needed, for a softer inner contour and cleavage.

Implant Selection

Type, profile, and dimensions matched to the patient — not to a number.

Implant selection is a clinical decision made with the patient. Dr Sparks selects an implant whose dimensions — base width, projection, and profile — suit the patient’s chest and tissue, not to a predetermined cup size. An implant that is too wide or too projecting for the anatomy is a common cause of an unnatural result and of long-term tissue stretch.

Incision Placement

Discreet, well-concealed incision options.

The augmentation is performed through an incision in the inframammary fold — the natural crease beneath the breast — where the scar is well concealed and the approach gives precise control of the implant pocket. Incision options are discussed at consultation and selected with scar concealment and surgical precision in mind.

Augmentation with a Lift

Combining augmentation with mastopexy where the breast has descended.

Where the breast has descended and the nipple sits low, an implant alone will not correct the position — it will simply enlarge a descended breast. In these patients, augmentation is combined with a breast lift (mastopexy), so that the breast is both lifted and given volume. Whether a lift is needed is assessed honestly at consultation.

Every element — implant choice, plane, internal support, and fat grafting — is planned together around the individual patient. The aim is a single coherent result: a breast that is fuller, well-shaped, well supported, and precise in the detail of its cleavage and contour.

What Surgery Involves & What Dr Sparks Assesses

Breast augmentation is planned around the individual patient. The consultation is unhurried, and a great deal of it is given to understanding the patient’s goals and matching them honestly to the anatomy.

  • Measurement of the chest and breast — base width, tissue thickness, skin quality, and the position of the breast and nipple.
  • Discussion of goals — the look the patient is seeking, with reference to proportion and a considered result, not a cup size alone.
  • Selection of implant type, profile, and dimensions to suit the anatomy.
  • Assessment of whether a lift is also required, and whether medial-pole fat grafting and the internal bra are indicated (in Dr Sparks’ practice, routinely).
  • A full, frank discussion of implant-related risks — including capsular contracture, rupture, the small risk of BIA-ALCL, and the symptoms patients describe as breast implant illness.
  • A clear statement that implants are not lifetime devices and that further surgery is likely at some point in the future.
  • An account of recovery, scarring, and what augmentation can and cannot achieve.

Breast implants are not lifetime devices. Over a lifetime, most patients with implants will require further surgery — to address capsular contracture, implant rupture, change in the breast over time, or simply elective change. Augmentation should be undertaken with this long-term commitment clearly understood.

Recovery & Aftercare

Recovery from breast augmentation is generally well tolerated. A supportive surgical bra and detailed, personalised aftercare instructions are provided, and the dual-plane (partly submuscular) position means some early muscle-related discomfort is expected.

First 2 Weeks

Swelling, muscle discomfort, supportive bra, and restricted activity.

  • A supportive surgical bra is worn continuously to support the implants and the fat-grafted areas.
  • Some discomfort related to the chest muscle is expected with the dual-plane position, particularly in the first week.
  • Lifting and reaching overhead are restricted; light walking is encouraged.
  • Most patients return to non-strenuous work within one to two weeks.
Weeks 2 to 6

Progressive return to activity and settling of the implants.

  • Everyday activity is gradually resumed; strenuous exercise, chest exercise, and heavy lifting are deferred until around six weeks.
  • The implants gradually settle into a more natural position as swelling resolves and the tissues relax.
  • Scar management begins once the incisions have healed.
Months 3 to 12

Final shape and scar maturation.

  • The breast shape continues to settle over three to six months; the medial-pole fat graft establishes its final volume by around three months.
  • Scars mature over 12 to 18 months — initially firm and pink, fading and flattening progressively.
  • Long-term review is recommended, and ongoing monitoring of the implants over the years is advised.

Risks and Important Information

All surgery carries inherent risk. The specific complications and considerations relevant to breast augmentation surgery are discussed in detail at consultation, and include — but are not limited to:

  • Capsular contracture — tightening of the scar capsule around the implant, which can cause firmness, distortion, or discomfort and may require further surgery.
  • Implant rupture or deflation, sometimes without symptoms, requiring removal or replacement.
  • BIA-ALCL — breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma — a rare, generally treatable cancer associated with breast implants.
  • The systemic symptoms some patients describe as breast implant illness; these are taken seriously and discussed honestly.
  • Implant malposition, asymmetry, or visible or palpable rippling — more likely with thin soft-tissue coverage.
  • Animation deformity — movement or distortion of the breast with contraction of the chest muscle, related to the partly submuscular position.
  • Altered or reduced nipple and breast sensation; potential effect on future breastfeeding.
  • Implants are not lifetime devices — further surgery is likely at some point, with its own costs and risks.
  • For the medial-pole fat graft — partial resorption, firm areas, or fat necrosis; changes that may appear on future breast imaging.
  • Bleeding, infection, delayed wound healing, or visible scarring.
  • Adverse reaction to anaesthesia or post-operative thromboembolic events.
  • Asymmetry, under-correction, or over-correction requiring revision surgery.
  • Outcomes that fall short of expectations despite a technically appropriate procedure.

In line with the requirements for cosmetic surgical procedures in Australia:

  • A referral from your GP is required prior to undergoing surgery.
  • A minimum seven-day cooling-off period applies between your initial consultation and the date of surgery.
  • You are encouraged to seek a second opinion from another appropriately qualified health practitioner before proceeding.
  • Any surgical or invasive procedure carries risks. Before proceeding, you should seek a second opinion from an appropriately qualified health practitioner.

All surgical information provided on this website is intended as general educational content only. Individual anatomy, health status, and circumstances vary. This material does not constitute medical advice and does not replace a formal consultation with Dr Sparks. Results depicted or described are not guaranteed and will differ between individuals. Dr Sparks’ practice operates in accordance with AHPRA guidelines and the Medical Board of Australia’s Code of Conduct.

Breast Augmentation FAQs

What is the dual-plane technique and why does Dr Sparks use it?

In the dual-plane technique, the implant sits partly beneath the chest muscle in its upper portion and partly beneath the breast tissue in its lower portion. This gives good muscle coverage over the upper pole — for a smooth upper contour and less visible rippling — while allowing the breast to take its shape in the lower pole. The degree of release is tailored to each breast, which is why it is Dr Sparks’ standard approach for most augmentations.

What is an internal bra and why is it used?

An internal bra is internal support placed within the breast to reinforce the lower pole and the implant pocket. Over years, the weight of an implant tends to stretch the tissues and allow the breast to descend. The internal bra acts as a reinforcing hammock that helps hold the implant in its planned position and resist that downward stretch — so the result is planned to be durable, not only good at the outset.

Why is fat grafting included in a breast augmentation?

An implant alone often struggles to create natural fullness in the medial pole — the inner breast and cleavage — and pushing an implant too far inward to chase cleavage produces an unnatural, over-close look with visible edges. Dr Sparks routinely grafts the patient’s own fat to the medial pole instead. This composite approach uses the implant for volume and the fat to shape the cleavage and soften the transition between implant and tissue, for a more natural inner contour.

Are breast implants permanent?

No. Breast implants are medical devices, not lifetime devices. Over a lifetime, the great majority of patients with implants will require further surgery at some point — to address capsular contracture, implant rupture, change in the breast over time, or elective change. Augmentation should be undertaken with this long-term commitment clearly understood, and Dr Sparks discusses it fully before any decision is made.

What is BIA-ALCL, and should I be concerned?

BIA-ALCL (breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma) is a rare cancer of the immune system that has been associated with breast implants, particularly certain textured implants. It is rare and, when detected and treated appropriately, generally has a good outcome. It is one of the specific risks discussed fully and frankly as part of the consent process, so your decision about augmentation is genuinely informed.

What about breast implant illness?

Breast implant illness is the term patients use for a range of systemic symptoms they attribute to their implants. It is not a formally defined medical diagnosis, but the symptoms described are real, and Dr Sparks takes them seriously. They are part of the open discussion before augmentation, so that the decision is made with a full understanding of the recognised and the reported risks of implants.

Will augmentation affect breastfeeding or mammograms?

Augmentation may affect the ability to breastfeed, though many patients are able to breastfeed after augmentation; this cannot be guaranteed. Implants can also affect how mammograms are performed and interpreted, so it is important to tell your screening provider that you have implants. Both are discussed at consultation.

What will my breasts look like?

A considered, proportionate approach is the central goal of Dr Sparks’ approach — and it depends on more than the implant. The dual-plane position gives good soft-tissue coverage, the internal bra supports the shape over time, medial-pole fat grafting shapes the cleavage, and the implant is matched to your anatomy, not to a predetermined number. Together these are planned to produce a breast that is fuller and well-proportioned.

Do I need a lift as well as an implant?

It depends on whether the breast has descended. If the nipple sits low and the breast has dropped, an implant alone will simply enlarge a descended breast — a lift is needed to reposition it. If the breast position is good, an implant alone is appropriate. Dr Sparks assesses this honestly at consultation and will tell you directly if a lift is required for a good result.

Next Steps

Dr Sparks will conduct an assessment of your chest and breast measurements, your tissue quality and the position of the breast and nipple, the implant type, profile, and dimensions that suit your anatomy, whether a lift or fat grafting is indicated, and the long-term commitment that implants involve, and develop a personalised surgical plan that combines your anatomy and your goals.

As featured in

All surgery and invasive procedures carry risks. Before proceeding, you should seek a second opinion from an appropriately qualified health practitioner. Read our full information on the risks of surgery. Dr David Sparks — Specialist Plastic Surgeon, MED0001863770.